Teacher Insights: National Teachers Award 2018 Winners and How They Achieved it  |  Technology Inceptions: Researchers Develop Metamaterial Morphs That Can Take New Shapes  |  Teacher Insights: Brain stimulation modifies memory   |  Teacher Insights: Babies display empathy for victims  |  Parent Interventions: Way to Reduce Hallway Disruptions   |  Parent Interventions: Picture books to introduce politics   |  Science Innovations: New way to strengthen metals  |  Science Innovations: Clue to make green polymers  |  International Edu News: Scholarship for study in Thailand  |  International Edu News: UK Visa Plan for Top Researchers  |  National Edu News: MSDE awards for entrepreneurship   |  Technology Inceptions: Google Assistant gets new features  |  Technology Inceptions: Multiple rear cameras for iPad Pro   |  Health Monitor: Childhood EPILEPSY  |  Cover Story: Line of Loose Control  |  
  • Pallikkutam Magazine
  • Companion Magazine
  • Mentor
  • Smart Board
  • Pallikkutam Publications

June 22, 2018 Friday 09:53:44 AM IST

Supreme Court Refuses To Allow CBSE Appeal In NEET Case

National Edu News

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today refused to allow CBSE's appeal against a Bombay High Court order asking it to give proportionate marks to a batch of candidates, who lost 30 minutes due to the invigilator's fault during the NEET undergraduate exam 2018. A vacation bench of justices S Abdul Nazeer and Indu Malhotra directed the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) to comply with the high court's order within 10 days.

The board had yesterday moved the apex court against the validity of the June 15 high court order regarding the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test which was held on May 6 for admission to MBBS course.

The high court had directed the CBSE to apply the formula suggested by the apex court and award additional proportionate marks to 24 students who had appeared in examination at Nagpur in Maharashtra but were not allowed by the invigilator to write the exam for the stipulated three hours.

Petitioner Vaishnavi Sandeep Maniyar moved the high court claiming that the invigilator allowed them to write the exams from 10.30 AM only, instead of the scheduled 10 AM.


The apex court had in the CLAT (Common Law Admission Test) case directed for applying normalisation formula on the basis of answering capacity of the candidates, aspiring for admission to National Law Universities, and allot additional marks in view of technical glitches faced by them.

In the instant case, the high court had directed the CBSE to revise the marks of candidates, release corrected mark-sheet by June 22 and consider them for second round of counselling for admission to MBBS course.

(Indebted to various sources)



Comments