Education Information: India sent Lakhs of Students to US in 2018-19, Second Largest after China  |  Policy Indications: National Policy on Biofuels  |  Technology Inceptions: Asus unveils dual-screen laptop series  |  Teacher Insights: Social hardship harms language skills  |  Science Innovations: Strong storms can generate quake-like seismic activity  |  Parent Interventions: Community care system benefits youth  |  National Edu News: Interdisciplinary Centre for Energy Research launched  |  Education Information: SCHOOL EDUCATION QUALITY INDEX  |  Health Monitor: ‘Health System for a New India: Building Blocks–—Potential Pathways to Reform’  |  Policy Indications: WCD Ministry to announce Bharatiya Poshan Krishi Kosh  |  Science Innovations: Dr. Harsh Vardhan calls for Developing Innovative Cooling Solutions  |  Policy Indications: Rashtrapati Bhavan to Host Conference of Directors of IITS,NITS and IIEST 19 Nov  |  Policy Indications: PM proposes first meeting of BRICS Water Ministers in India  |  Policy Indications: First ever International Buyer- Seller Meet in Arunachal Pradesh  |  National Edu News: UNICEF-Department of Posts Conduct Stamp Design Contest for Children  |  
October 01, 2017 Sunday 11:39:09 AM IST

State of Professional Education in India

Policy Indications

Education is a burning topic in Kerala and professional education even more so. Irrespective of the party in power, every year, the State Assembly witnesses ruckus over issues such as fee hike, seat allotment, NRI (Non-Resident Indian) quota and NoC (No-objection Certificate) for new colleges for professional courses in the higher education sector.

 

The hullabaloo around meetings between the association of private college managements and the State Government (most of the times, the meetings end up in the Chief Minister’s chamber), proceeding court cases and pandemonium or suspension in admissions to the colleges due to uncertainty and lack of clarity in the procedures, are annual rituals in Kerala.

 


A string of protests by student outfits cutting across political parties keeps up the momentum. This year too was not an exception, as discussions and debates fortified the issue of determining the fee structure in self-financing medical colleges in the state.

 

It all began with the formation of the Fee Regulatory Committee (FRC) to come up with the fee structure in self-financing medical colleges. The committee headed by Justice R. Rajendra Babu fixed the fee provisionally at Rs 5 lakh per annum for general merit seats and Rs 20 lakh per annum for NRI seats. The college managements challenged the decision at the High Court, questioning the validity of the committee. Even though the High Court ruled in favour of the government, the Supreme Court issued an interim order, allowing the managements of self-financing colleges to charge Rs 11 lakh as admission fee.

 


A critical question is overlooked in this case. How can a committee appointed by a government or a court (be it the High Court or the Supreme Court) fix a uniform fee for colleges across the state? As pointed out in the FRC (Fee Regulatory Committee) report, various factors need to be considered while fixing the fee, such as location of the college, nature of the medical course, cost of land and building, available infrastructure and equipment, expenditure on administration etc. These costs will not be uniform for all the colleges in the state.

 

The cost of living varies across cities. Likewise, the cost of running a college also varies. If the fee is fixed at either Rs 5 lakh or Rs 11 lakh, some colleges will be at the losing end and some others at the gaining end. This, in turn, will affect the quality of medical education provided in the state.

 


The level of governmental regulation that exists in the school education sector and the higher education sector in Kerala is disproportionate. Private schools are mushrooming in the state, as parents prefer to send their students to these schools. The private school managements enjoy full autonomy in fixing the fee in their schools. As the supply side of the schools is in excess to the demand side, the market determines the fee structure that is followed by the managements. Competition among private schools has ensured a level-playing field and largely succeeded in imparting quality education to the students.

 

It has been possible because the school education market provides options for the parents to decide which school their ward should enrol in. Different categories of schools have ensured affordability and availability indexed to the function of the quality at the end. However, as we move up the education ladder, the level of regulation and issues

intensify.


 

In Kerala, there are 1,063 MBBS seats in nine Government colleges and 1,250 seats in eleven self-financing colleges. But the seats in both government and self-financing colleges were not completely filled in the current academic year. At the same time, a large section of students are moving abroad from Kerala to get enrolled for medical courses. It clearly shows that the high interference by the government in the medical education sector has yielded the opposite results.

 

In fact, the government should have opened up the sector so that even students from the abroad should have found Kerala a favourite destination for medical education. This would have improved the quality and the chances for cross-subsidizing the needy students.


 

The policy to universalise the fee structure in highly competitive professional degree courses is misguided. The inadvertent bearing would be the limited supply of institutions offering professional courses. Foreign universities within the same country like the US or the UK, where a large number of Indian students enrol for higher education, charge different fees.

 

The education system must be viewed as a pyramid, where the base should be strong with the government having a greater role in ensuring that students have access to basic education. The government should limit its role as we move up the pyramid. In Kerala, the trend is just the opposite.


 

In the present scenario, the government fixing the fee at a predetermined level will only push the medical education system to a crisis. Instead of fixing the fee, the government should take measures to ensure that the students have access to credit at reasonable interest rates. Availability of credit is important, as the students can then choose their preferred institutions. This system will ensure more competition and better quality education.

 

However, there should be a regulatory framework; as otherwise, the banks will be flooded with NPAs (Non-performing Assets) in education loans. The banks can act as regulators in this structure. India has various credit information companies (CIBIL, Equifax, Experian, and Highmark) that collect data from individual consumers to estimate their creditworthiness, thereby helping the lenders to gauge their repayment capacity. In a similar way, banks should maintain a record of the students obtaining loans for medical education. If the students are unable to repay the loans, it shows that they are unable to find jobs in the market. This, in turn, throws light on the inability of an institution to equip the students with necessary skills or its failure in imparting quality education to the students.


 

As banks will decline to sanction loans to the students opting for the institutions recording major loan defaulters, such institutions will struggle to sustain. Thus, education institutions will become more accountable, as they are liable to provide quality education, necessary infrastructure and equipment on a par with their fees.

 

With more institutions imparting quality education coming up in the state, Kerala will be able to attract students from across the globe, transforming the state into an educational hub.


 

Kerala has examples of engineering colleges that failed to impart quality education to the students, making them unfit for the job market. It took the Kerala Technological University to step in and take measures ag ainst such colleges. The crisis could have been averted, had there been a proper market mechanism to signal the academic performance of these institutions. Instead of fixing a uniform fee and pushing the medical education sector into a crisis, the Government should necessitate steps for a competitive market for higher education.



Dr D. Dhanuraj

The author is the Chairman, Centre for Public Policy Research
Read more articles..
Comments