Leadership Instincts: A new tool to decide on making or breaking a dam developed  |  Science Innovations: The death and resurrection of kilogram  |  Parent Interventions: Music improves communication skills of autistic children   |  Teacher Insights: Do you undergo ‘social jet lag’?  |  Parent Interventions: Social media could affect self-esteem of women  |  Technology Inceptions: Raspberry Pi 3 Model A+ With 512MB RAM, 5GHz Wi-Fi Connectivity Launched  |  Technology Inceptions: AMD Radeon RX 590 Mid-Range GPU Announced for Full-HD PC Gaming  |  Leadership Instincts: When ‘small changes’ better than ‘no change’ at all  |  Science Innovations: Alexa and Siri may in future learn language as kids do!  |  Teacher Insights: Ideas are contagious as disease  |  Science Innovations: Universe: Why is there something, instead of nothing?  |  Technology Inceptions: NASA's Hubble Telescope finds smiling face in space  |  Cover Story: HOME TRANSFORMERS FAMILIES WILL NEVER BE THE SAME  |  Cover Story: Thou shalt not discriminate  |  Rajagiri Round Table: FOR AN EQUAL SHARE OF THE PIE  |  
  • Pallikkutam Magazine
  • Companion Magazine
  • Mentor
  • Smart Board

February 03, 2018 Saturday 11:01:16 AM IST
Overconfidence Colors Exam Results

3 rd February, 2018. Confidence and overconfidence are essential aspects of human nature. However, to measure (over)confidence is not easy. A study conducted by researchers from the Higher School of

Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Tinbergen Institute has analyzed the effects of overconfidence on the results of exams. They studied students’ forecast of the results of their exams by a sample of about 500 second-year graduate students enrolled in a statistics course in Moscow. The course contained three exams and each student produces a forecast for each of the three exams. To estimate overconfidence quantitatively, the researchers have developed a model. The key observations of the study are listed below:

  • Part of a student's grade expectation is based on the student's previous academic achievements; what remains can be interpreted as (over)confidence.
  • The model predicts that students' expectations are not rational and that most students are overconfident.
  • Less obvious is that overconfidence helps: given the same academic achievement, students with larger confidence obtain higher exam grades. Some studies suggest that overconfident students are less successful at exams since they allocate less time and efforts to study. This may be the case for some students, but we find that for most students overconfidence is advantageous, possibly because it increases ambition, morale, resolve, persistence, and hence the probability of success.
  • Female students are less overconfident than male students, their forecasts are more rational, and they are also faster learners in the sense that they adjust their expectations more rapidly.
  • Overconfidence decreases during the course and is smallest at the third exam, which shows that students adjust their expectations as information accrues, in particular when the third exam has a higher weight in the total course grade.
  • Tip to teachers: Don't wait too long in setting your first test. This will help students to adjust their

    expectations at an early stage, and this in turn will be of use to them in their allocation of time and

    effort for the course.

    (For more details: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02346/full)

    Comments