Parent Interventions: Navigating through the Pandemic  |  Health Monitor: Attention and Memory Deficits in People Who Experienced Mild Covid  |  Parent Interventions: How can we Revert Peanut Allergies in Children?  |  Teacher Insights: Play Based Learning has a Positive Impact on Child's Learning and Development  |  Health Monitor: Social Media Use Likely to Affect the Physical Health of a Person  |  Parent Interventions: How to Deal with Developmental Language Disorder in Children  |  Health Monitor: Lifestyle Interventions from Early Childhood Prevents Cardiovascular Diseases  |  Teacher Insights: Teacher Expectations Can Have Powerful Impact on Students Academic Achievement  |  Policy Indications: Make Sure the Digital Technology Works for Public Good  |  Teacher Insights: The Significance of Social Emotional Learning Curriculum in Schools  |  Health Monitor: Forgetting is a Form of Learning  |  Higher Studies: University of Manchester Invites Application for LLB and LLM Programmes   |  Health Monitor: Is There a Blue Spot Inside our Brain?  |  Parent Interventions: Babies born during the Pandemic Performs Lower during Developmental Screening  |  Policy Indications: Invest in Structural Steel R&D : Prof BS Murty  |  
December 28, 2021 Tuesday 10:22:37 AM IST

MIT’s Field Research in India for the Ultra-poor

An experiment done by MIT antipoverty researchers based on a “Targeting the Ultra-Poor” (TUP) program that aids people living in extreme poverty have generated positive effects on consumption, food security, income, and health, which grew fairly steadily for seven years after the start of the program, and then remained intact after 10 years as well. The study was based on rural West Bengal, India which was centred on people so poor their average daily household consumption was the equivalent of $1.35 in 2018 U.S. dollars. The program seen to be positive by looking at the result. By the end of the experiment, people helped by the TUP program had seen their incomes increase by about 30 percent compared to those not in the program. These findings suggest that many people are stuck in a “poverty trap,” unable to improve their circumstances because of their lack of resources in the first place. But “big push” programs, like the TUP policy used in the experiment, can change the situations.  

TUP programs were pioneered by BRAC, a large nongovernmental organization located in Bangladesh. The version of it developed for the MIT experiment started in 2007, covering 120 village settlements in West Bengal. An important aspect of the study is the highlights about how the very poor were able to increase their earnings. At first, households earn more from their increased livestock holdings, although that relative difference shrinks over time. But families in this study were then able to diversify their sources of self-generated income and gain more wage earnings.


Comments