Health Monitor: Care for your Gut  |  Education Information: CBSE cancels class 10 Board Exams, postpones Class 12th Board Exams  |  Policy Indications: Dr Harsh Vardhan announces launch of `Aahaar Kranti’  |  Teacher Insights: X or Y? Learning is Beyond Getting the Equations Right!  |  Policy Indications: Atal Innovation Mission collaborates with Bayer  |  Parent Interventions: NITI Aayog Launches‘Poshan Gyan’, a Digital Repository on Nutrition Information  |  Education Information: EdCIL pays a highest ever dividend of Rs 12.5 Crore for the year 2019-20  |  National Edu News: Fitness Challenge for the Nation - 70th RRT Conference Intl. on 16th April  |  Parent Interventions: Reading for Fun Improves Language Skills  |  Technology Inceptions: Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro  |  Technology Inceptions: Canon New image Runner Advance Dx  |  Technology Inceptions: Boat Bar 4000 DA  |  Teacher Insights: Digital Tool to Detect Fake News  |  Science Innovations: HGCO19: starting the enrolment for the PhaseI/II human clinical trials  |  National Edu News: Scientists discover the farthest Gamma-ray emitting active galaxy   |  
February 06, 2020 Thursday 01:16:58 PM IST

Is it possible to reduce political polarization?

Leadership Instincts

In the run-up to the 2016 U.S. presidential election, an unusual experiment suggested that it might be possible to influence American voters to adopt less polarized positions. Posing as political researchers, a research team from McGill and Lund Universities approached 136 voters at the first Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton presidential debate in New York. Participants were asked to compare Trump and Clinton on various leadership traits (such as courage, vision, and analytic skills) by putting an X on a sliding scale.

Using a simple magic trick, the researchers then covertly manipulated the results (by substituting one completed survey sheet for another) so that most of the survey answers appeared moderate, closer to the midpoint between Trump and Clinton. They then presented these more moderate responses to the participants as being their own answers.

Willingness to accept and explain more moderate opinions

Surprisingly, 94 % of the respondents accepted the manipulated responses as being their own answers and readily justified the moderate views. For example, one participant who initially heavily favoured Trump claimed, “I guess I fall somewhere in the middle — I’d like to think I’m a little moderate. I think at this point it’s important to be open-minded” — even though they had reported more polarized views moments earlier.


The researchers then replicated this study online with nearly 500 participants and found no difference in the results between Clinton and Trump supporters. The majority of the participants were again susceptible to the manipulation and rationalized their ostensibly moderate responses. Afterwards, to ensure that it did not affect the participants’ attitudes in the longer term, the researchers debriefed them and explained the manipulation.

(Content Courtesy: https://www.mcgill.ca/newsroom/channels/news/it-possible-reduce-political-polarization-319816)

Comments