Higher Studies: IELTS Mock Tests: Benefits and Characteristics  |  Teacher Insights: New Features in Moodle 4.0  |  Policy Indications: India-US Launch Climate Action and Finance Mobilisation Dialogue  |  Science Innovations: Stanford University Develops Algorithm to Predict Molecular Structures  |  Technology Inceptions: Oxygen Concentrator, Generation System Developed by Indian Institute of Science  |  Teacher Insights: Early Intervention in Children Good to Prevent Dyslexia  |  Parent Interventions: Cognitive Stimulation Lowers Dementia Risk  |  Parent Interventions: Elderly Cope Better with Pandemic  |  Policy Indications: Use of Copyrighted Works in Online Education  |  Parent Interventions: Maternal Voice Reduces Pain in Preemies  |  Teacher Insights: Eye Sight of Children Affected by Online Learning  |  Expert Counsel: Afghanistan: Top Trouble Spot  |  Best Practices: 'Money Box' Project Gets National Recognition  |  Best Practices: Craft World School Support in Fighting Pandemic  |  Cover Story: High Enrollments , Low Outcomes- Right to Quality Education in India  |  
September 11, 2019 Wednesday 03:52:19 PM IST

How does Our Brain Make Choices- New Mathematical Model Developed

Science Innovations

Human beings are constantly faced with a situation to make choices-whether to go by bus or car, which colour to choose for shirt or to go for movie or visit a friend's house.

University of Geneva (UNIGE) researchers in partnership with Harvard Medical School has developed a mathematical model of the optimal choice strategy. When the difference in quality between too choices is great, the choice is made quickly but if the differences are negligible, it takes a longer time for us to reach a decision.

There are two types of decision-making: first, there is perceptual decision-making, which is based on sensory information: Do I have time to cross the road before that car comes nearer? Then there is value-based decision-making, when there is no good or bad decision as such but a choice needs to be made between several proposals: Do I want to eat apples or apricots? When taking value-based decisions, choices are made very quickly if there is a large difference in value between the different proposals. But when the propositions are similar, decision-making becomes very complex even though, in reality, none of the choices is worse than any other. Why is this?

The value of a choice lies in the difference Satohiro Tajima, a researcher in the Department of Basic Neurosciences in UNIGE’s Faculty of Medicine, designed a simple mathematical model that demonstrates the following: the optimal strategy when faced with two propositions is to sum up the values associated with the memories you have of each choice, then calculate the difference between these two sums (do I have more positive memories linked to chocolate eclairs or macaroons?). The decision is made when this difference reaches a threshold value, fixed in advance, which determines the time taken in making the decision. This model leads to rapid decision-making when the values of the two possibilities are very far apart. But when two choices have almost the same value, we need more time, because we need to draw on more memories so that this difference reaches the decision threshold. Is the same process at work when we have to choose between three or more possibilities?


For each choice, we want to maximise the possible gain in the minimum amount of time. So, how do we proceed? The first step is exactly the same as when making a binary choice: we amass the memories for each choice so we can estimate their combined value, explains Alexandre Pouget, a professor in the Department of Basic Neurosciences at UNIGE. Then, using a mathematical model based on the theory of optimal scholastic control, instead of looking at the cumulative value associated with each choice independently, the decision rests on the difference between the cumulative value of each choice and the average value of the accumulated values over all the choices. As in the earlier case, the decision is made when one of these differences reaches a pre-determined threshold value.

“The fact that the decision is based on the cumulative value minus the average of the values of all the possibilities explains why the choices interfere with each other, even when some differences are glaring,» continues professor Pouget. If the different possible choices have similar values, the average will be almost identical to the value of each choice, resulting in a very lengthy decision-making time. «Making a simple choice can take 300 milliseconds but a complicated choice sometimes lasts a lifetime, notes the Geneva-based researcher. The UNIGE study shows that the brain does not make decisions according to the value of each opportunity but based on the difference between them. “This highlights the importance of the feeling of having to maximise the possible gains that can be obtained,” says professor Pouget. The neuroscientists will now focus on how the brain revisits memory to call on the memories associated with every possible choice, and how it simulates information when faced with the unknown and when it cannot make a decision based on memories.


Comments