Policy Indications: NTPC accelerates Learning & Development Opportunities for 19000 Employees  |  National Edu News: Prime Minister announces "My Life My Yoga" Video Blogging contest  |  Science Innovations: IASST scientists develop herbal medicine loaded smart bandage for wounds  |  National Edu News: 4 COVID-19 Bio Banks established by the Department of Biotechnology  |  Science Innovations: A Rapid Response Regulatory enabling mechanism against Covid-19  |  National Edu News: Scaling up of COVID testing centres in laboratories and Universities   |  Leadership Instincts: DST initiates COVID-19 India National Supermodel  |  Policy Indications: Responsible AI for Youth Programme  |  National Edu News: IT Minister Launches National AI Portal of India- www.ai.gov.in  |  National Edu News: Researchers culture novel coronavirus, may help in vaccine development  |  Education Information: Cardiff achieves ‘Champion’ status for gender equality in physics  |  Parent Interventions: Online survey to assess needs of children and young people with cancer   |  Parent Interventions: Study links severe childhood deprivation to difficulties in adulthood  |  Parent Interventions: New study aims to learn the lessons of homeschooling  |  Teacher Insights: Using e-learning to raise biosecurity awareness  |  
November 19, 2018 Monday 01:58:55 PM IST

A new tool to decide on making or breaking a dam developed

Leadership Instincts

Decision on building a dam is truly complex due to the large number of trade-offs it would require both economically, socially and politically. A group of researchers from multiple disciplines has joined forces to achieve a more efficient balance among these trade-offs in a decision to build a dam. The results of their work is published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

Dams are constructed for hydroelectricity, flood control and irrigation. However, dams that are obsolete pose safety risks or have large negative impacts on ecosystems, require dismantling. In both instances, difficult trade-offs and divergent stakeholder preferences can greatly complicate decision-making processes. For example, conservation groups and resource agencies may seek to the removal of dams that prevent these species from reaching their spawning grounds. But other stakeholders may value the diverse services that dams can provide.

"This is exactly the kind of problem where you need an interdisciplinary team with the right mix of expertise to help quantify trade-offs and identify promising solutions from multiple perspectives," says Sam Roy, lead author from the University of Maine.

The aim of the tool is to maximize both the economic and ecological benefits. It adopts a machine-learning approach to simulate the many trade-offs and find solutions that maximized total benefits, based on which calculated risks could be taken.


"We also find that it is possible to improve the trade-offs between certain criteria by coordinating multiple dam decisions at larger spatial scales," says Roy. "This means that there are many opportunities to find win-win solutions that can simultaneously improve dam infrastructure, freshwater ecosystems and decision costs by selectively removing, modifying or even constructing specific dams in a river basin."

Source: DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1807437115


Comments