Teacher Insights: Chocolate, the Right Food to Improve Your Brain Power  |  Leadership Instincts: Strong Bricks Can Be Made from Bio solids and Clay  |  Parent Interventions: Order of Birth in Family Has Influence on Intelligence  |  Cover Story: MIND THE NET  |  Technology Inceptions: Oppo’s 10X Lossless Hybrid Zoom Smartphone Camera Tech to Enter Mass Production   |  Technology Inceptions: AI Can Help Improve Understanding of Earth Science  |  Cover Story: THE CYBER BRAIN  |  Science Innovations: New treatment for osteoporosis   |  Technology Inceptions: SpaceX Protests NASA Launch Contract Award  |  Science Innovations: Cost-efficient catalysts  |  Technology Inceptions: NASA to Launch New Space Telescope in 2023 to Explore Origins of Universe  |  Leadership Instincts: Social Media Cannot Cause Depression  |  Parent Interventions: Maternal Grandmothers Can Raise Survival Rate of Grandchildren  |  Teacher Insights: Waking Up Early No Guarantee for Success  |  Teacher Insights: Ask your girl child to do science, not become scientist  |  
  • Pallikkutam Magazine
  • Companion Magazine
  • Mentor
  • Smart Board

November 19, 2018 Monday 01:58:55 PM IST
A new tool to decide on making or breaking a dam developed

Decision on building a dam is truly complex due to the large number of trade-offs it would require both economically, socially and politically. A group of researchers from multiple disciplines has joined forces to achieve a more efficient balance among these trade-offs in a decision to build a dam. The results of their work is published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

Dams are constructed for hydroelectricity, flood control and irrigation. However, dams that are obsolete pose safety risks or have large negative impacts on ecosystems, require dismantling. In both instances, difficult trade-offs and divergent stakeholder preferences can greatly complicate decision-making processes. For example, conservation groups and resource agencies may seek to the removal of dams that prevent these species from reaching their spawning grounds. But other stakeholders may value the diverse services that dams can provide.

"This is exactly the kind of problem where you need an interdisciplinary team with the right mix of expertise to help quantify trade-offs and identify promising solutions from multiple perspectives," says Sam Roy, lead author from the University of Maine.

The aim of the tool is to maximize both the economic and ecological benefits. It adopts a machine-learning approach to simulate the many trade-offs and find solutions that maximized total benefits, based on which calculated risks could be taken.

"We also find that it is possible to improve the trade-offs between certain criteria by coordinating multiple dam decisions at larger spatial scales," says Roy. "This means that there are many opportunities to find win-win solutions that can simultaneously improve dam infrastructure, freshwater ecosystems and decision costs by selectively removing, modifying or even constructing specific dams in a river basin."

Source: DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1807437115

Comments